It's one of NVMe SSDs to be based on Realtek's RTS5763DL SSD controller, and otherwise the significant differences between this and SX6000 are modest read and write speed increases, up to 2,100MB s and 1,500MB s respectively.. All three of XPG SX6000 Pro's capacity options are remarkably affordable by NVMe standards 512GB model we tested is the best value, working out to just 20.8p gigabyte, while 256GB and 1TB models cost 22.4p and 25.8p per gigabyte.. Samsung would point out that Evo has the potential to go much faster, with stated read speed of 3, speed of 2,500MB s.. Sure enough, CrystalDiskMark's standard sequential test, XPG SX6000 Pro produced measured read speed of 2,128.1MB s and write speed of 1,541.1MB s, 568.4MB s read speed and 2,514.6MB s write speed... In CrystalDiskBench's 4K file test, XPG SX6000 Pro beats the odds to come out on top, recording read speed of 374.7MB s and write speed of 347.3MB s. In the huge file test, speed of 1,040.6MB s, 115.6MB s. £86.17. $52.99.. In the large files test, XPG SX6000 Pro average read speed of 824.3MB s and write speed of 820.6MB s, resulting in clearer win for Evo, 010.8MB s respectively.. however, XPG SX6000 Pro had except caught up, putting in average read speed of 337.1MB s and write speed of 376.3MB s. Judging from the numbers given for these two drives, you'd expect Evo to crush SSD, and the only conditions in. It's actually surprising, in hindsight, that Adata has chosen not to angle XPG SX6000 Pro specifically it's concerned with the single-sided design, making the drive thin enough for in ultra-slim laptops..
Read more